Since the start of this semester, I began to notice something peculiar. I have been apologising so often that I think the act has lost its meaning. As pointed out by one of the websites in the reading list, apologising directly for a mistake committed shows sign of taking responsibility for our actions. It can also improve our emotional intelligence as human beings are usually more willing to forgive and forget. However, this is not applicable in my case. I did not apologise to take responsibility for my own actions but rather, I used it to bring an end to all the conflicts. I shall use a personal conflict which I encountered a few days ago to illustrate my point.
I am a fourth year student majoring in Chemical Engineering and am currently engaging in my final year project (fyp). Unlike my other course mates who have postgraduates to guide them for the project, I do not have a postgraduate as a mentor for my project as the topic I am working on is in a totally new area. I am practically left on my own to solve all the problems which I encounter during the course of the project. Occasionally, I will seek help from my supervising professor when I am really desperate. I did not realize the impact of going “unsupervised” in the laboratory until a few days ago when I was trying to select a spot in the laboratory to culture my cells.
I approached one of the postgraduates to enquire on the use of one of the fumehood in the laboratory for culturing my cells. However, he expressed concern over the possibility of cross contamination of my work with others and recommended me to culture the cells using the biohazard fumehood which was being used by another postgraduate, Jessica. I thought it would be appropriate for me to consult Jessica for the use of the biohazard fumehood before I start culturing my cells. However, the outcome of my act of courtesy turned out to be pretty disastrous.
After I explained the purpose of my visit and that I was recommended by another postgraduate to consult her on the use of the biohazard fumehood, she began to fire me a series of questions which caught me off-guard. She began to ask me about my educational background, my experiences in cell culturing, the identity of the postgraduate supervising my project and the type of cells I am intending to culture. Her eyes were narrowed into a slit and there was a look of disapproval and disbelief when I told her that I am just an undergraduate with zero experience in microbiology and have no supervising postgraduate. After that, she began to lament about how my work can threaten the work of the rest and got a little worked up when she heard that I was contemplating of culturing cells in the biohazard fumehood as recommended by the other postgraduate. She practically stormed out of the room and had a mini confrontation with that postgraduate. After a few minutes, she returned and said that the postgraduate did not suggest that I go to the biohazard fumehood to culture my cells but rather, to conduct my other laboratory work there. After she completed her sentence, I apologized immediately by explaining that I may have made a wrong interpretation of his suggestion.
I related the incident to my sister and she thought it was unnecessary for me to apologise since I was certain that I did not misinterpret the postgraduate’s suggestion. However, I had my reasons for doing so. Firstly, from Jessica’s first reaction, I could tell she was undergoing a lot of stress. Her stress level was out of control and that may be the reason why she kept interrupting me when I tried to explain my situation to her and that I will not start culturing cells until I have completed my training session. Secondly, although I tried to reassure her that I do understand the importance of good laboratory practices in order not to jeopardize the work of others and using non-verbal communication techniques such as “uh-huh” to tell her that I understand her concerns, I was unable to calm her down. She seemed to be under the impression that I am a potential danger to her work and was not in the least receptive to any of my explanations. Thirdly, she seemed to think that I was trying to defend myself by saying that it was another postgraduate who suggested using the biohazard fumehood and even went to confront that postgraduate. At that point in time, I thought no amount of explanation would suffice and that the conflict would escalate if I did not apologise as she is a pretty persistent person and her emotions seemed to be spinning out of control. In addition, I thought it would be easier for me to approach her for help the next time if I did not defend myself.
My apology was worthless but was useful in this incident as it brought an end to this conflict. However, I wonder whether there are better alternative solutions to handle this kind of conflict.
5 days ago